If you ask me, the only interesting thing that happened to him was someone sending him rifle cartridges. And the only thing he's done by himself is gotten a school constructed. Is this a ceremonial President as well?
Monday, September 16, 2002
4:27 AM
| S Anand
|
The Kashmir Times discusses the powers of our President to implement his vision. Turns out that he can address the Parliament on any issue he feels like. Not surprising, perhaps, but no President has done it so far. It would be good if Dr. Kalam could ignite some passion in the minds of our leaders.
4:20 AM
| S Anand
|
Two "nuclear heads" to meet. Dr. Kalam will be meeting Leonid Kuchma, President of Ukraine, designer of missiles and satellites.
4:12 AM
| S Anand
|
Azad, from Akbarpur in Bihar, sent Dr. Kalam two rifle cartridges and a letter. Through the postman. Fortunately, Azad was mentally unstable, and thought it a good idea to send the cartridges to the President. (Hindustan Times)
Could anyone throw more light on this Azad?
Wednesday, September 11, 2002
1:48 AM
| S Anand
|
Interesting account of how Dr. Kalam's visit to MP resulted in a school at Khandwa. It is quite clear from his comments to the press, and his other actions, that children and education are a priority with him.
I wonder... is there an inside story behind that?
1:43 AM
| S Anand
|
A summary of Dr. Kalam's 11 weeks of Presidency by The Straits Times. I found two pieces of information interesting: that he conducts classes at Anna University (Madras) through video-conferencing. And that he plans to establish centres with video facilities across the country so that students everywhere can communicate directly with him.
Tuesday, September 03, 2002
12:18 AM
| S Anand
|
In response to Dr. Kalam's 3 questions on polls in Gujarat, the Supreme Court decided that it's OK to have elections till December, and will think about the rest of the questions on September 17th.
In 1951, The Representation of the People Act laid out who can stand for elections. It also says if you were convicted for this and that, you can't contest.
On May 2nd 2002, the Supreme Court said: "Candidates must reveal if they were arrested (and why), and the state of their finances." Logical, because you need this to figure out whether the candidate can contest or not.
On August 16th 2002, the Government discussed and approved an ordinance on poll reforms. They made it clear that even if a person is arrested twice for "heinous crimes", he/she could contest. It's only if the person is convicted that he/she cannot. And that financials would have to be fully disclosed. But, the ordinance went clearly against the SC order (and was intended to nullify it).
On August 16th 2002, the National Campaign for Electoral Reforms approached the President and laid out the conflict. The SC says, "thou shalt reveal your convictions and thy spouse/dependents' finances." The Ordinance says, "No matter what the SC or the EC or anyone says, thou need not reveal more than what this Ordinance says." Specifically, the some details on convictions and dependents' finances need not be revealed.
On August 23rd 2002, as we know, the President sent the Ordinance back, seeking clarification on the conflict. Now, this was probably only a clarification. But the Cabinet sat, discussed it as if the President returned the Ordinance, and sent it back in the same form.
Now, the President has to sign it. The Act will be passed.
Now, this is a tricky issue. The SC said something. The Lok Sabha said the opposite. Which view should prevail? And what should the President's role be in all this?
1. Can the Election Commission say "no elections" even if it means no Government for more than 6 months?
2. If yes, should President's rule be imposed in Gujarat?
3. Or should it just carry on the election as best as it can?
The Gujarat assembly was dissolved on 19 July. So a new assembly is needed before 19 Jan 2003. I guess that's enough time to figure out what to do, and have the elections.
1:52 AM
| S Anand
|
I finally figured what the issue at Gujarat is. The EC says "Don't have elections in Gujarat. The place is in a mess." But Article 174 says, "You can't have no Government for more than 6 months." BJP says, "Hey, we want elections, because we'll win." But that's not good enough. So they say, "Article 143 says the President can stop everything and check the Supreme Court what they think, if he thinks necessary.
I don't know if the President thought it necessary. But he has agreed to check with the Supreme Court.
It is probably a safe decision. After all, the Supreme Court's decision is binding. But was it necessary? More importantly, whose decision was it, really?
1:45 AM
| S Anand
|
Satyen Mohapatra writes about Y S Rajan, Dr. Kalam's friend, who accompanied him on his Gujarat visit.
What I find interesting in the article is that "Kalam’s Hindi is poor." That's interesting. I can relate to that, but I definitely did not expect it.
BJP was sure of winning, so didn't like the result. Now the matter will be referred to the President and the Supreme Court. The decision will be made on Wednesday. How independent will Dr. Kalam's decision be?
Saturday, August 17, 2002
4:14 AM
| S Anand
|
PakNews doesn't like it that Musharraf "shamelessly greets the enemy" on Independence day. Pretty strong. I suppose the Pakistan press would be at least as biased against India as the Indian press is against Pakistan.
My view is that Dr. Kalam talks about freedom in the sense of fundamental rights -- along the lines of Tagore and the American declaration of independence. That all men are created equal, free to pursue their "inalienable rights".
China traded this freedom for economic development. Somewhat like Sparta in 500BC. India has chosen democracy. Somewhat like Athens. In the war between Sparta and Athens, Sparta won. (In a few centuries, neither kingdom existed.)
But I'd rather live in a civilisation like Athens. Better culture. Greater equality. And less chance of a civil war.
10:07 PM
| S Anand
|
"Excellency, on behalf of the government and people of Pakistan and my own behalf, I have pleasure to convey to you and the people of India our warm greetings on the occasion of Independence Day of the Republic of India." -- President Pervez Musharraf.
Incredible. The first visit the President makes, and it turns into a mud-pit of political agendas.
Thursday, August 08, 2002
10:22 AM
| S Anand
|
Charan Lal Sahu, a Supreme Court advocate who filed nomination for Presidency, has questioned Dr. Kalam's nomination. Apparantly the nomination lacks his antecedents and age. If it were true, does that invalidate his Presidency? Probably not, given that he's been sworn in.
Wednesday, August 07, 2002
8:25 AM
| S Anand
|
Dr. Kalam continues his early morning walks at around 4am. Only hitch is, so do 100 security personnel -- some of whom stay up all night.
12:10 AM
| S Anand
|
An interview (PDF) with Dr. Kalam in August 1990 on the management of technology development programmes, when he headed the DRDO missile programme.
12:10 AM
| S Anand
|
Memoirs from Rajinder Taggar on an press conference with Dr. Kalam. Towards the end, he points out that he "... needs to improve his outer appearance to match his bright self inside."
Sunday, August 04, 2002
5:35 AM
| S Anand
|
Thanjai Nalankilli asks whether Dr. Kalam was "pressured or even 'black-mailed' into studying Hindi?" Now, I must admit that, irrespective of the answer to that question, it's the most interesting one I've heard raised post Dr. Kalam's election.